Lady Gaga is performing at Madison Square Garden in NY on July 6,7 and 9 and February 21 and 22. Her trademark representatives beliieve that bootleg merchandise will be sold at these shows, and have filed a ‘John Doe trademark…
Lady Gaga John Doe Complaint
June 28th, 2010 · No Comments
Tags: Copyright · Design rights · Trade marks
Important Decision: Gucci Pleads Good Contributory Infringement Action Against Credit-Card Processors
June 27th, 2010 · No Comments
This is an important SDNY decision. Gucci sued companies that process credit card transactions for ‘replica’ websites. On 12(B)(6) motion, Court holds: Gucci can proceed with its action against Defendants if it can show that they (1) intentionally induced the…
Tags: Copyright · Design rights · Trade marks
Letter from AmeriKat I: Bits ‘n Bobs
June 20th, 2010 · No Comments
Last week while the AmeriKat was finishing her final LPC exams and looking forward to escaping the six years of law school shackles, the rest of the world was gearing up for summer World Cup madness (no comments about England’s performance from the Ame…
Tags: Copyright · Design rights · Trade marks
Counterfeits: can the consumer also be the villain?
April 20th, 2010 · No Comments
The IPKat, Merpel and Tufty have received an interesting and indeed provocative question from a reader who writes:
“Dear Feline CreaturesI am writing an article about the possible role of consumers in transactions involving counterfeit goods. In this context I have some ideas about a re-allocation of emphasis.
The theoretical point that I want to discuss is concerns the possibility of legal liability for consumers for purchasing counterfeit goods — as a kind of contributory negligence; I refer to such consumers as potential “counterfeitees”.
Are you aware of any legislation or case-law, anywhere, proposing and/or imposing a legal liability on such a basis? Any known scholarly sources or comments on the topic would be very helpful too”.
The Kats can’t think offhand of any specific legislation, though they have to concede that consumers are often wilfully blind, or very negligent, in buying goods which, from the price, the context of the sale, the quality of the packaging or the demeanour of the seller, they might have good reason to suspect of being infringements.
Tags: Copyright · Design rights · Trade marks
Cancúnterfeit conference opens
December 1st, 2009 · No Comments
Now’s the time for all enterprising counterfeiters to get busy with their felonious craft, since so many of the world’s experts in dealing with them are in Cancún, Mexico, for a midwinter break. According to the joint press release released by WIPO on behalf of IMPI, INTERPOL, WCO, WIPO, BASCAP and INTA:
“Senior decision makers from governments, law enforcement, customs and the private sector are gathering in Cancún for the Fifth Global Congress on Combating Counterfeiting and Piracy to identify solutions to the worldwide trade in fake products which pose a threat to health and the global economy.More than 500 delegates from nearly 30 countries are attending the three-day meeting (1-3 December) hosted by INTERPOL and the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property (IMPI) to share proposals in reducing the impact of fake goods and identify and build upon successful strategies already in place.
Supported by the World Customs Organization (WCO) and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) with the co-operation of the world’s business community, represented by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) through its Business Action to Stop Counterfeiting and Piracy (BASCAP) initiative, the International Trademark Association (INTA) and the International Security Management Association, the Congress provides a unique international public-private sector partnership.
INTERPOL Secretary General Ronald K. Noble opened the Congress saying the threat posed to the health and safety of individuals and the potential damage to economies should not be underestimated [They're certainly not underestimated by IP rights owners, who are often accused of inflating the extent of their loss. The only people who underestimate it are the folk who allocate so little public funding for fighting counterfeits where they're made and sold, and so much funding for travel to Cancún], citing recent joint initiatives as evidence of the will and ability to take the fight to the criminals.
“Recent successful operations, such as Operation Pangea II [which is a small step in the right direction and a confidence-boost, here] tackling the online sale of counterfeit and illicit drugs, have shown that coordinated action between the public and private sectors does have results, but more importantly it shows that we are taking the fight to the counterfeiters,” said Secretary General Noble. …
“The social and economic losses associated with these illegal activities, such as the loss of jobs and tax revenues, constitute a critical concern for governments across the globe,” said IMPI Director General Jorge Amigo Castaneda. [the loss of tax revenues is itself a justification for far greater investment in fake-fighting] …
… WIPO Director General, Mr Yo Takagi, Assistant Director General said …
“The tough economic conditions confronting governments, businesses and citizens around the world, at a time when the trade in fake goods continues to escalate, put into sharp relief the need to find practical, realistic and effective solutions to reduce the negative impact of counterfeiting and piracy and to promote greater respect for intellectual property rights around the world,” …Michael Schmitz, WCO Director of Compliance and Facilitation, added, “Tackling the trade in counterfeit and pirated products requires a multi-pronged approach by all stakeholders [Multi-pronged! Just watch those flashing forks ...]. Dangerous counterfeit goods and even more shockingly fake medicines cannot be allowed to continue flowing across borders unhindered. The health and safety of consumers around the world is paramount [The border issue raises a question that some countries seem reluctant to tackle: how much do border guards earn through regular salaries when compared with bribes? How well are they trained and supervised? What happens to goods detained at the border? And are the fake medicines given an unhindered passage because they are in transit and not deemed to be 'on the market'?].
“The WCO will be doing all it can in close co-operation with its international partners to stop this vile trade through enhanced Customs capacity building, an improved Customs-business dialogue, better co-ordinated border management, and rolling multi-agency enforcement operations,” Schmitz stressed.
…Leaders at the Congress are expected to present their views on strategies to deal with the increasing trade in counterfeit and pirated products. The OECD estimates that the trade in fakes crossing international borders alone is valued at more than US$200 billion annually [This isn't so much more than the total spent by the British government in subsidising the profligacy and/or negligence of its banks in the past year or so]. During the Congress, BASCAP will deliver a report to delegates presenting new economic data on the cost of counterfeiting, including the impact on jobs, reduced foreign investment, tax losses, and increased spending on health and law enforcement. BASCAP also will present new research on why consumers buy fake products and what it will take to change those purchase habits”.
The Kat will be watching keenly for further developments.
Tags: Copyright · Design rights · Trade marks
